This is a great gem about Larry Miller and the planned Bahai takeover of the World, which in typical lyin' Larry fashion he denies. It is a long article I found but I felt it best to post it in its entirety as I think it is relevant how the Bahais suck up to corporate America for power and money. Also there are many capped words, the majority of which were made by the person who wrote the post - I only added a few here and there and just a few comments of my own.
How does this all relate to IMBRA? Very very much so. It says on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order_(Bahá'Ã)
"Some of the principles outlined in the (Bahai) New World Order include the setting up a (Bahai controlled) WORLD GOVERNMENT which could ENACT LAWS required to satisfy the needs of all (Bahai feminist) people."
Sounds like IMBRA to me. In fact IMBRA is probably the Bahai test of sneaking in the first of many laws to come.
An interesting recent discussion of Bahai Larry Miller and his plans for the BAHAI NEW WORLD ORDER which shall control us all - with him as King and Layli as Queen presumably. IRS please take note on the obvious LOBBYING going on with Larry Miller, Layli Miller-Muro, the Tahirih Justice Center, our tax dollars and THEIR BAHAI plans for religious domination replacing all other religions AND governments, especially the U.S. Government!
To quote the master liar himself:
"There is no Baha’i plan to impose its values or teachings on anyone. "
"Baha’is do not participate in politics."
"(Bahais) believe in obedience to the civil government in whatever country they find themselves."
"You have nothing to fear from Baha’is."
"Baha’is do not seek to make you like us."
"As if you were having so much effect that I was trying to stop you. In your dreams!"
"The moment you start ranting and spewing out ridiculous conspiracy theories you are immediately dismissed."
"Your websites are a great threat to our upcoming takeover of the world."
"the Baha'i Faith is the evil empire taking over the world."
Glad to see other people are also onto this obvious scam. And if nothing else, at least scroll down to part 2 (the next post)

to read Larry Miller's pathetic response to the poster.
Perhaps Larry can spare a moment from LOBBYING for the Bahai Faith takeover and Tahirih Justice Center to enlighten us about this post. We know Larry and Layli read ODR everyday!
Here we go folks! Enjoy and if you like this, wait until you read my upcoming post on AGENDA 21 and the Bahais!
______________________________________________
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Talk/talk.religion.bahai/2008-12/msg00053.htmlRe: Larry Miller/Lawrence M Miller- Permanent Board Member Tahirih Justice Center-father of TJC Center founder (Layli Miller-Muro), published EXPERT ON BAHAI CORPORATE PRINCIPLES/STRATEGIES.
* From: maybeiam101@xxxxxxxxx
* Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:51:45 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 6, 3:28 am, PaulHammond <pahamm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, Larry Miller works as a consultant, and is also a Baha'i.
Tell me, how SHOULD he have made his living?
Are you kidding me? I find it difficult to take a reply like this seriously, as its almost total incredulity to the point of the post is a bit hard to believe. Regardless, since you pretty much missed (or chose to miss) the entire point of the last post I made about the nature of certain NGO groups, issues of Revolving Door and Social
Network theory which impact upon the analysis of power within corporate and private sectors, I will remind you of those points in relation to this post.
1) Though you may POTENTIALLY be able to a make a moral judgement
about the virtue of working/having worked for these companies (and
probably made a small fortune from it), I am NOT NECESSARILY making
such a judgement, however
2) when you are a VERY HIGH PROFILE member of a distinctly identified
Baha'i business community, have published books on Baha'i related
business strategies and speak at Baha'i business conferences, and are
now involved in an NGO group (Tahirih Justice Center which your ACTIVELY BAHAI DAUGHTER founded), ) I imagine that as the Baha'i (as with other religions)
there may be some sort of moral or ethical code to which you praport to adhere. This makes somewhat more appropriate to make a moral judgement about a person's/organizations activities. Personally, I believe there are HUGE ethical issues at work in attempting to ENMESH A RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION SUCH AS THE BAHAIS WITH INCREDIBLY POWERFUL AND CORRUPT CORPORATE ENTITIES. For me, the activities of the companies that Larry Miller has consulted with (and proudly displays on his website) have been, and continue to be utterly morally reprehensible, and I do perceive a great conflict of interest in
claiming to be acting in the social and moral interests OF THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE when the most IMMEDIATE BENEFIT gleaned from an involvement with these companies is a) PERSONAL, b) SPECIFICALLY FOR THE BAHAI COMMUNITY (including and especially the Tahirih Justice Center.)
3) HOWEVER, the point I am making is not dependent upon a moral
judgement of how Lawrence M Miller should or shouldn't have made his fortune.
Rather, it is about the power, and influence wielded by the Baha'i
organization and the various NGO and corporate groups it is involved
with, when FOR TAX AND LEGAL PURPOSES, the organization claims to be a
POLITICALLY NEUTRAL RELIGIOUS BODY working for the benefit of mankind.
The issue here is about TRANSPARENCY OF PURPOSE within an organization
that has VERY LOFTY GOALS that potentially affect the ENTIRE WORLD
should their stated aims be achieved (see further discussion of the problems with these issues below).
As you paid no attention to these points in a previous post I made, let me re-iterate the issue at hand. Note well, there is no implicit PERSONAL JUDGEMENT about Lawrence M Miller contained within them. Rather, I am simply presenting an analysis of why the way he (like his daughter Layli and their Tahirih Justice Center)has conducted his business in such close ideological and economic proximity to the Baha'i organization and it networks is potentially highly problematic.
What exactly is the problem with the pattern of corporate involvement that seemingly occurs within the Baha'i organization, and why should its corporate and political associations be continually questioned?
Baha'i prophecy/philosophy 101: A NEW BAHA'I WORLD ORDER- (n.b. before
you launch a simplistic 'conspiracy theory' attack against these terms, note well the context in which I'm discussing it.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order_(Bahá'Ã)
"Some of the principles outlined in the New World Order include universal peace; the UNITY OF RELIGION (i.e. all religions become Bahai) ; the setting up a (Bahai controlled) WORLD GOVERNMENT which could enact laws required to satisfy the needs of all people; an elected world parliament; a binding world tribunal; a world police force; a universal bill of human rights; the universal right to education; the setting up of an auxiliary universal language (Farsi I assume), the continued diversity of culture; a system of world commerce through the establishment of an equitable economic system where the economic security of the (Bahai elite) individual is assured.
This is the openly discussed goal of the Baha'i organization. There can be little doubt that ushering in and occupying a central part in such a vision takes enormous financial and political resources. Yet, people on this board/who defend the Baha'i organization in general get up in arms when the power structures behind this vision are criticized, or when people raise the fact that every single aspect of
the way power is wielded in such an organization should be brought under the closest possible scrutiny, in order to prevent potential corruption within such a massive, over-arching system of power.
What is described here IS the VERY ORWELLIAN REALITY that conspiracy
theorists talk about! World Police! World Bank! World Laws! Do not be alarmed- continue enjoying your economic equality/prosperity! Of course the 'government' of this system talks about universal justice, human rights, economic opportunity- you gotta sell the thing somehow! Yet, people on this board act all surprised when 'theories' are raised regarding exactly how such a vision would be realized, or the
potential problems behind it. This is an organization that SHOULD have every possible angle of its reasoning questioned and scrutinized to the highest degree when it envisages such a HUGE agenda as this.
As for the Baha'is having no particular part in the political process of this "New World Order" (as so many claim with mind blowing incredulity), given the way the ORGANIZATION COURTS GOVERNMENTS, LOBBY GROUPS, corporations and NGO groups, the idea that CERTAIN OF THEIR MEMBERS (Larry Miller, Layli Miller-Muro) AND INSTITUTIONAL ARMS have no significant power or influence
is utterly beyond belief. Does this implicate every single Baha'i in some nefarious worldwide plan? Of course not. Does this make simply being a Baha'i a crime? Of course it doesn't. What is in question is the role of the greater Baha'i organization, and those of its members and networks that posses particular instruments of influence and power (the elite.) In this case, let's review Larry Miller/ Lawrence M Miller's previous client list again, taking into account the numerous direct links that these companies maintain with the TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER and its board members:
Air Canada
AIESEC International
Allina Health Care
Amoco Oil
American Express
Honeywell
Compass
Alabama Power Company
Bell Canada
Chick-fil-A
Clark Schwebel
Coca-Cola, USA
Corning
Delmarva Power & Light
Dial Corporation
Eastman Kodak
Exxon, USA
Harris Corporation
Honda America Manufacturing
Landmark Communications
McDonald’s Corporation
Merck
Met Life
Murray Ohio Manufacturing
NationsBank
Plymouth Tube
Printpack
QuickTrip
Sara Lee Corporation
Shell Oil Company
Scott Paper Company
Southwestern Bell
Springs Industries
Star Tribune
Tarmac America
Texaco
Upjohn Company
Varig Airline
Let us now look at another quote from pg 16 of Lawrence M Miller's "This Revolutionary System.The Evolution of Human Capacity: The Revolutionary System. of BAHAI ADMINISTRATION. Perspective, Characteristics, &. Competencies"- (available at archive.changing- times.org/fileadmin/presentation-material/05/miller-this_revolutionary_system.pdf)
Larry Miller says “The institutions of the present-day Baha'i Administrative Order,
which constitute the "structural basis" of Baha'u'llah's World Order, will mature and evolve into the BAHAI WORLD COMMONWEALTH. In this regard, Shoghi Effendi affirms that the Administrative Order "will, as its component parts, its organic institutions, begin to function with efficiency and vigour, assert its claim and demonstrate its capacity to be regarded not only as the nucleus but the very pattern of the NEW WORLD ORDER destined to embrace in the fullness of time the whole of mankind".
Lets just read that again: " its organic institutions, begin to function with efficiency and vigour, assert its claim and demonstrate its capacity to be regarded not only as the nucleus but the very pattern of the New World Order destined to embrace in the fullness of time the whole of mankind "
The NUCLEUS AND PATTERN of the NEW WORLD ORDER EMBRACING THE WHOLE OF MANKIND? So, if this is the goal Lawrence M Miller's corporate
strategy is working towards based on the goals of the Baha'i organization, how can it be argued that the way a person of influence such as Larry/Lawrence has conducted and continues to conduct his business under the banner of the Baha'i organization and its related principles and strategies, is of no consequence? Do you honestly expect anyone to believe that Lawrence M Miller (or anyone else acting in a similar capacity) would simply cut all ties with these companies
when he is actively working to affect the stated goals above? This is in fact CONTRARY to the very strategy he lays out!
At present, the pattern of corporate (and possible government involvement) painted so far (and I would once again refer you to the concepts of Social Network Theory and Revolving Door Politics to elucidate the methods of reasoning behind such analysis) demonstrates no radical and beneficial social agenda other than the maintenance of a specific American corporatist/political power bloc. Again, if you
operate a business/religious organization, you cannot claim to be genuinely changing/challenging any aspects of a system of injustice and oppression if you are even tangentially involved with the goals and strategies of the very corporate institutions that have been largely responsible for the maintenance of those elitist power structures. Moreover, as Lawrence M Miller has stated HIMSELF, the
goal is not to be TANGENTIALLY INVOLVED with these corporations, but
actively encourage and support their role within the society he/the Baha'is envisage. These corporations have been, and must continue to be held CRIMINALLY RESPONSIBLE for their actions, and not just be able to avoid the consequences of prior activities by paying financially expedient 'token' malpractice fines (if you've seen "The Corporation", you'll know what I mean). Neither must they be allowed to simply absolve themselves of corporate malpractice within the sphere of public morality simply by manipulating their corporate image through
positive association with philanthropic entities. The much talked about but, but ultimately widely misunderstood Rockefeller Foundation is one of the masters of corporate philanthropy, and yet is being increasingly implicated in the very subtle, yet monumentally potent forces of DEMOCRACY MANIPULATION. These are not your common garden variety conspiracy theories, devoid of any real sophistication. These are the very real, evidentially verifiable movements of corporate subversion and political corruption.
Again, as I have previously stated (but obviously not clearly enough to prevent you, Paul, from making such utterly irrelevant comments as asking me "how SHOULD he have made his living"
In this context, a very specific institutional agenda can potentially be identified. Namely, that whilst creating the image that they are part of the solution for certain social, economic and political 'status quos', including unfair distribution of wealth, gender injustice, and environmentally irresponsible corporate activity, their
organizational mechanisms and methods of wielding influence actually suggest a far different perspective. Rather than actually CHANGING anything, they are merely attempting to create the ILLUSION OF CHANGE, whilst preserving the interests of their own organizations. As was the case with someone like Maurice Strong (Baha'i or otherwise is not important in this case), this person could be seen as championing a liberal, socially responsible (even socialist), environmentally
sensitive political and institutional agenda (many of the principles of which I would totally support in theory), his actions, both within bureaucratic and corporate/financial institutions, suggest that he is involved in a wider process designed to ensure a smooth transition of power within a certain corporate and financial elite. Granted, he may create certain small changes in corporate environmental policy along the way, but ultimately there as long as there is nothing to lose by making these concessions (or creating the illusion of them) the status quo of the power elite essentially remains the same. Such strategies need not suggest anything massively conspiratorial beyond the simple raison d'tre of the corporate model, which most people no not fully understand anyway. If a lot of people don't fully understand (or want to understand) the way institutional power operates, there's not really that much need for conspiracy. LIkewise, if you interpret the corporate strategies someone like Lawrence M Miller appears to use, you are potentially not affecting any real change in the corporate environment that benefits humanity. If he doesn't really want to do that, fine, no judgement here. However, what an organization that supposedly acts in the public morality should do, is not provide an
easy means of corporations involving themselves with supposedly philanthropic enterprises, when they continue to act in criminally liable ways (again, see the many lists of 'corporate fines' available online and elsewhere). Moreover, to establish a system in which these companies maintain their power and are not in any way held to account for their prior actions is staggeringly irresponsible.
For example, ExxonMobil has been responsible for enormous environmental depletion and damage. Suppose, for reasons of simple long-term economic survival, it seeks to shift to supposedly 'clean' energy and associated industries. This is,
1) preceded by a shift in corporate image, assisted not only by marketing, but by its association with amiable NGO/philanthropic groups who benefit from it financially,
2) guaranteed continued support within political institutions by astute mediation by the likes of Maurice Strong and other powerful people who move easily between the private and public sectors, and sit on more advisory boards (Tahirih Justice Center) than you can poke a stick at, and
3) engineered purely as a means of corporate survival and maintenance of an economic status quo. The market changes, change your product as much as you can to its needs, but only enough so that it continues to support your company without affecting the bottom line,
Once again, let me CLEARLY STATE the issue here, aside from any personal judgement about Larry Millers/Lawrence M Miller's personal character. The implications of an entrenched organizational corporate ideology to the Baha i movement, that seeks to intrinsically involve itself with processes of corporate strategy and GOVERNMENT LOBBYING (as all major corporations do) raises VERY serious questions about its true nature and purpose, and status as a politically neutral, NGO 'religious' body.