Online Dating Rights. Mail Order Brides
PragueVietnamMoscowGuatemala

FOUR REASONS American men seek romance abroad: Prague, Ha Long Bay, Red Square, small villages in Latin America. Somehow meeting a Czech, Vietnamese, Russian or Peruvian/Colombian/Brazilian woman for a date at one of these exotic places is incomparably more exciting than meeting a hometown girl at the local coffeeshop. Opponents of a man's right to meet foreign women online never stop to consider how enjoyable it is to travel/work/live abroad and learn new cultures and languages while seeking a marriage partner.
Online Dating Rights
September 02, 2010, 03:43:50 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Abusegate: Mother of All Scandals?  (Read 1404 times)
tristan
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1102



« on: January 20, 2010, 06:31:36 PM »

Abusegate: Mother of All Scandals?
Monday, January 18, 2010
By Carey Roberts
Mirror, mirror, on the wall, what’s the most colossal scandal of them all? Watergate? Climategate? Tigergate? If you said ‘yes’ to any of these, you’re not even close!

Folks, we’re not talking about a media-adled tempest in a teapot. No, this is an old-fashioned head-banging, sit-down-and-cry-your-eyes-out affair.

Abusegate refers to our nation’s flawed crusade to curb domestic violence (DV). Originally a high-minded and well-intentioned effort, the end-abuse campaign has now fallen prey to an invidious anti-family agenda. In the name of making homes safe, the domestic violence industry curtails fundamental civil rights and often betrays those in greatest need.

Let me count the ways our domestic violence effort has failed to deliver on its promises, all the while undermining our most cherished values and societal institutions:

1. Takes advantage of vulnerable women. Our abuse shelters are filled with women who are just as violent as the men they left. When abused women come for help, they need a safe place where they can get counseling, housing assistance, and treatment for substance abuse problems. But instead they get a hefty dose of gender ideology proffered in the name of promoting “female empowerment:” http://www.radarsvcs.org/docs/RADARreport-Are-Abuse-Shelters-Helping-True-Victims.pdf

2. Stereotypes men as abusers. Amanda McCormick of Praxis International recently shocked abuse conference attendees with this calumny: “I know a lot of men who deserve to be beaten.” Less than two months later the Department of Justice awarded a $3.5 million grant to her organization, prompting Examiner.com columnist Trudy Schuett to wonder why the federal government is using taxpayer money to subsidize anti-male hate-speech.

3. Misrepresents the truth. The domestic violence industry often pretends women are never violence-prone, ignoring the hundreds of studies that show females are equally likely to slap, shove, and punch their spouses and boyfriends: http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm Remember former NFL star Steven McNair?

4. Featherbeds ineffective programs. Each year the domestic violence industry takes in over a billion dollars of federal support. And what good are those programs doing? “NOT PERFORMING: Results Not Demonstrated,” the federal Office of Management and Budget declares on its website: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/expectmore/summary/10002150.2004.html

5. Spends millions on programs that place victims at risk. Thanks to the Violence Against Women Act, the federal government spends millions of dollars each year to promote “mandatory arrest” laws. But according to research by Harvard economist Radha Iyengar, such policies actually increase partner homicides by nearly 60%.

6. Subscribes to a radical ideology. In their effort to undermine the family, abuse industry representatives often recite claims like “a marriage license is a hitting license.” Turns out the opposite is true — persons in stable married relationships are the least likely to be abused, compared to persons in dating or co-habiting relationships.

7. Breaks up families and harms children. Legal scholar Jeannie Suk has authored a chilling analysis that details how domestic violence laws allow a man to be vacated from his home without a shred of hard evidence. Marital break-up ensues and children wind up in a single parent household: http://www.yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/439.pdf

8. Abhors accountability. Pay a visit to the website of the DoJ Office of Violence Against Women: www.usdoj.gov/ovw . Attempt in vain to ferret out even basic information about the millions of taxpayer dollars the agency awards for domestic violence services every year.

9. Promotes false allegations. The DV industry tries to convince women to summon the police for every tiff and squabble — and rewards them handsomely for doing so. (One analysis of restraining orders in West Virginia found 70% of restraining orders are unnecessary or false.) Before long the legal system becomes bogged down with trivial and false cases of partner abuse – making it harder for the real victims to get the help they so desperately need.

10. Flouts the Constitution. Our Constitution was designed to protect innocent citizens from the arbitrary use of government power. Maybe that’s why the VAWA Mafia has worked to circumvent constitutional guarantees of due process, probable cause, and equal protection under the law.

Ms. Erin Pizzey was the founder of the first abuse shelter in the world. In her essay, “The Planned Destruction of the Family,” Pizzey reveals how her movement was hijacked by a group of schemers whose true agenda had little to do with curbing domestic violence. “Destroy the family and you destroy the country,” Pizzey laments.

Yes, our country needs laws such as the Violence Against Women Act to thwart partner aggression. But our current approach is in desperate need of an overhaul.

Logged

Calling a foreign woman a mail order bride who met her husband via the internet, as do many American women, is insulting and racist.  Kneejerk feminists who use language to shape thoughts, e.g. "marriage broker" for "dating service", use this term to denigrate these women and the men who marry them.
bugman7
Full Member
***
Posts: 204




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2010, 07:18:41 PM »

Quote
Pizzey reveals how her movement was hijacked by a group of schemers whose true agenda had little to do with curbing domestic violence.


Whenever these humanitarian charities start out on a new paradigm to provide vital services for a a newfound problem or need, initially they have good intentions. Several years ago trafficking was almost completely an unknown problem. Then about 30 years, Federal agents raided a single textile factory in New York, that was a human sweat factory. The news media
and the public were aghast and everone (or so it seemed) agreed something had to be done about the problem.
In the beginning the first anti trafficking organizations were well intentioned with little or no resources. 

After a period of time elapsed , other organizations realized that if they could convince the public there was a epidemic of trafficked men and women they could get Federal grant money to solve their manufactured problem. The federal grant money would be used partly to fund their own one sided studies, along with expanding the definition of trafficking. Competition got even more intense as more and more anti trafficking organizations sprang up to lap up money.

 What started out as a well intentioned effort by a few anti trafficking organizations in the beginning has led to the same type of hijacking by greedy schemers, who abandon their primary mission to help other people, while their executives can live in those million dollar homes.
   
History always repeats itself. 
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page August 27, 2010, 02:35:44 AM

MKPortal ©2003-2006 mkportal.it