By the way, I shouldn't have to be the only American who can dissect Suzanne Jackson's radical slander of the dating industry. I cannot fly to Atlanta to be the Plaintiff's "expert" on the International Matchmaking Industry, although as a customer for 14 years, I am the real expert:
[Asian groups have used
fiancee visas and marriage with a so-called "jockey" (an escort bringing women
across the U.S. border) to bring women into the U.S. for purposes of prostitution;
jockeys have even included U.S. military personnel posted abroad.]
Nice touch of hatred by a radical feminist for the military. But servicemen are often so politically correct that they would not take this as the insult it was meant to be.
In any event, it is irrelevant how foreign criminals cover their deeds. They do not use American-owned dating websites and Americans are already subject to laws that ban bringing women into the USA for prostitution.
You cannot regulate breathing because someone who breathes committed a crime.
[IMOs are almost completely unregulated, advertise minors for marriage, and fail to
screen their male clients for criminal histories.]
Of course online dating websites on are almost completely unregulated and that is the way it will remain in the free world. If the USA does not want to be a member of the free world, I should contact more foreign journalists.
French and German dating websites often consider 16 to be the age of consent to date. Ironically, Russian and Filipina dating sites almost always consider 18 as the minimum age.
France and Germany are first world countries.
NOTE THAT THE EC LAWYER IS GOING TO HAVE TO PREPARE THE FIELD FOR THIS KIND OF RHETORIC SO THE JUDGES ARE IMMUNIZED. MAYBE JUDGE COOPER SAW THROUGH THE RHETORIC LAST SPRING BUT HIS DELAY MAKES ME WONDER AND I KNOW THAT THE APPEALS COURT OR SUPREME COURT WILL BE LISTENING TO SUZANNE JACKSONS GARBAGE:
WE HAVE BEEN WARNED THIS EVENING BY THIS DOCUMENT: SUZANNE JACKSON WILL SAY THIS VERY SAME NONSENSE TO HIGH LEVEL FEDERAL JUDGES IN THE USA. HOW ARE WE GOING TO GET A REBUTTAL ACROSS TO THOSE JUDGES BEFORE SHE SPEAKS?
[IMO practices exacerbate problems with false expectations: they require women to complete long questionnaires asking intrusive personal questions,]
What?? Leaving aside the fact that IMBRA burdens US men with unconstitutional questions, 99% of dating sites include a pathetic sentence saying the woman wants to meet a kind and faithful man and she likes kittens!
In fact, it was MY BUSINESS PLAN 7 YEARS AGO TO PROVIDE A MORE DEPTH INTERVIEW but men basically choose on looks, including myself, so my business plan to ask tons of questions did not work.
BUT HAVING SAID THAT, THE LONG INTERVIEWS WITH ALL THOSE QUESTIONS WERE EXTREMELY PLEASANT. The women loved being interviewed and talking about their favorite books and movies, etc.
[encouraging disclosure by implying or stating that
false answers could lead to cancellation of any ensuing immigration benefits.]
This is "hearsay". I am not a lawyer but I know enough about the law to know that the US federal judges don't need to be adjudicating on hearsay and anecdotes.
[Women are also subjected to medical and background checks, and may assume that
participating men are evaluated with the same level of scrutiny. ]
On what planet are women subject to such checks for a dating website?
ON WHAT PLANET ARE WOMEN SUBJECT TO SUCH CHECKS FOR A DATING WEBSITE?
[Women from other countries often assume that all governmental agencies in the United States - a
country with extraordinary resources and technology - have access to information
held by other agencies, that facts asserted in applications for immigration benefits
would be checked, and that a man who had been convicted of serious violent crimes
would not be permitted to bring a spouse or fiance into the U.S. from abroad.]
THIS IS BLATANT AND MENTALLY SICK RHETORIC: PRETENDING THAT FOREIGN WOMEN TEND TO BELIEVE ANY SUCH THING...ARE THE US COURTS SUPPOSED TO ADOPT RADICAL FEMINIST POSITIONS BECAUSE SOME ARAB WOMEN MIGHT COME TO THE USA BELIEVING THAT AMERICAN MEN AND WOMEN ARE MORE TIGHTLY REGULATED?
ARE WE SUPPOSED TO GO FASCIST BECAUSE SOME MUSLIM WOMEN ASSUME THAT WE OPERATE LIKE THEIR HOME COUNTRIES? Do not assume Russian women expect such control in the USA. There is no such regulation in Russia as everyone remembers the Soviet Union.
[The industry does nothing, however, to screen male customers:]
Not true at all. I screened the hell out of my customers. But online dating websites cannot not be responsible legally for background checks. NOTICE THE RHETORIC THAT MAKES IT SOUND SHOCKING THAT A FASCIST LAW HAS NOT ALREADY BEEN IMPLEMENTED: SHE MENTIONS LATER THAT MOBA 1996 WAS NEVER ENFORCED JUST LIKE IMBRA MUST NEVER BE ENFORCED (IMBRA REPLACES MOBA)
[no detailed questionnaire,]
MUST NOT BE LEGALLY REQUIRED FOR SOCIALIZING WITH OTHERS ON THE INTERNET ESPECIALLY IF THIS REQUIRES IDENTIFYING ONESELF OR PROVING AGE
[no check for a criminal record for spousal or child abuse,]
THIS WOULD REQUIRE POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION AND AGE VERIFICATION FOR USE OF THE INTERNET. THE SUPREME COURT ALREADY RULED AGAINST THIS IN THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT AND WHY HAS EUROPEAN CONNECTIONS NOT MENTIONED THIS?
[no formal inquiry as to whether men are already married.]
IF A MAN VOLUNTEERS THAT HE IS MARRIED, MOST AGENCIES WILL TELL HIM TO GET LOST BUT, having said that, THE US GOVERNMENT CANNOT RE-OUTLAW MARITAL INFIDELITY!
IS THIS BROWNBACK'S ANGLE? HE WANTS TO SPLIT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY BY MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR A MARRIED MAN TO DATE ONLINE?
I UNDERSTAND SUCH LAWS EXIST IN MISSOURI?
DO YOU SEE HOW THE RADICAL FEMINISTS ARE ALLYING WITH THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT ON THE SUBJECT OF BANNING MARITAL INFIDELITY?
NOW DOES EVERYONE SEE WHY THE "CHRISTIANS" ARE NOT HELPING MEN WITH THEIR RIGHTS?
[Until recently, the U.S. government also did not
conduct these inquiries.]
In order to get married, an American man should be allowed the privacy he has had for the past 50 years regardless of whether he is marrying a foreign woman or an American woman.
[An IMO can also be a useful tool of, and sometimes a knowing collaborator with, an
individual man who wishes to obtain control over a woman in order to exploit her. A
U.S. citizen can use isolation, domination, and threats of deportation]
NOW THIS WHOLE SECTION GOES INTO THEORY AND HEARSAY AND ANECDOTES THAT A FEDERAL JUDGE SHOULD KNOW IS HIS CUE TO FALL ASLEEP
[Add to the facts in both scenarios above that the citizen forces a woman to have sex
with other men who pay him for the privilege.]
THE JUDGES SHOULD STILL BE SLEEPING BECAUSE THIS IS IRRELEVANT HEARSAY AND THEORY AND/OR ANECDOTE
[Add to the facts in any scenario that instead of using a fiancee visa to secure a
woman's entry into the U.S., the man marries her abroad and brings her to the U.S.
as his wife. These scenarios, distilled from actual cases,10 all fulfill the
elements of the federal crime of forced labor: domestic labor or sexual services]
FOR RADICAL FEMINISTS LIKE SUZANNE JACKSON MARRIAGE ITSELF IS DOMESTIC LABOR AND SEXUAL SERVICES
[They should also satisfy the elements of criminal sex trafficking, if the required
element of 'commercial sex act" is interpreted on the basis of the statutory
language rather than a myopic intepretation focusing exclusively on brothel-based
prostitution or monetary transactions.]
SO THE FEDERAL JUDGES WILL BE MYOPIC IF THEY DO NOT CONCLUDE THAT DATING AGENCIES ARE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANYTHING FORMER MEMBERS DO, in this case for when a man actually wants his wife to cook or clean or have sex with him (commercial sex act for the non-myopic).
[Commercial sex is defined in the Trafficking
Victims Protection Act as "any sex act, on account of which anything of value is
given to or received by any person."]
THAT DOES IT: I CANNOT PAY FOR ANY MORE MEALS WITH AMERICAN WOMEN IN WASHINGTON DC: WE MIGHT GET ARRESTED IF WE HAVE SEX LATER.
[When an IMO sells a young woman for sexual purposes, as in a Web page openly
offering sex with fifteen- to seventeen-year old Thai girls,]
THAT IS NOT THE DEFINITION OF AN IMO!!!!
DID FEDERAL JUDGES FALL FOR THESE 4TH GRADE SCHOOLYARD TACTICS?
[boasting that a girl could be delivered "anywhere in the world," charging extra to deliver a virgin, and
also offered girls for sale outright - pay $4,000 more, the company promised,"and
then she is like your slave forever."
THERE ARE PLENTY OF LAWS AGAINST SUCH A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
THERE IS NO LOGIC HERE ON WHY DATING SITES NEED TO BE REGULATED SIMPLY BECAUSE CRIMINALS OPERATED A WEBSITE SOMEWHERE, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY PRETENDED TO BE A DATING SITE (ALTHOUGH IN THIS CASE IT SOUNDS LIKE THEY DID NOT EVEN PRETEND TO BE A DATING SITE)
YOU CANNOT PUNISH PEOPLE FOR BREATHING SIMPLY BECAUSE SOMEONE WHO BREATHES COMMITS A CRIME
[this is clearly commercial sex
[If both parties to the sale know that the person will be forced or
coerced to have sex, both are sex traffickers.]
DUH! Except you cannot then state that a dating site owner will know whether a man will abuse his new girlfriend or wife.
IF FOREIGN DATING SITES ARE TO BE REGULATED - AMERICAN DOMESTIC DATING SITES MUST BE REGULATED - PLENTY OF AMERICAN WOMEN ARE ABUSED WHO MET A MAN ON MATCH DOT COM
[The formality of a marriage or a supposed engagement to marry should not blind us to the federal crimes of sex
trafficking, forced labor and involuntary servitude: when a citizen threatens to
revoke an application for a green card unless an immigrant submits to sex]
DID FEDERAL JUDGES FALL FOR THIS CHILDISH LINK BETWEEN REAL CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR AND THE THEORY THAT A MARRIED MAN WILL WITHHOLD SOMETHING HIS DOMESTIC OR FOREIGN WIFE WANTS IF, FOR SOME REASON, SHE DECIDES THAT SHE IS NO LONGER ATTRACTED TO HIM?
NOTICE HOW SUZANNE MAKES THE NOT SO SUBTLE IMPLICATION THAT ALL FOREIGN WOMEN WHO MARRY AMERICAN MEN ARE NOT INTERESTED IN ACTUALLY HAVING SEX WITH THEIR HUSBANDS?
NOTICE HOW THE CONCEPT THAT A MAN OFTEN LOSES SEXUAL INTEREST IN HIS WIFE AND THEN CHEATS ON HER...WAS ALREADY ADDRESSED ABOVE?
MEN APPARENTLY NEED TO BE REGULATED FOR NOT WANTING SEX WITH THEIR WIVES AND FOR WANTING SEX
[the valuable consideration of legal residency in the United States fulfills both the
"commercial sex" requirement and the coercion requirement of the criminal sex
trafficking statute. ]
I DO NOT LIKE USING CAPITAL LETTERS AND ODR MEMBERS KNOW I USE THEM VERY RARELY BUT SUZANNE JACKSON OF THE GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW SCHOOL IS OVER THE TOP HERE. AND I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT FEDERAL JUDGES HEARD THIS CRAP IN THE ENCOUNTERS CASE AND DID NOT REGISTER THEIR DISBELIEF IN THE FINAL DECISION (INSTEAD THEY SWALLOWED THE WHOLE LINE OF THOUGHT - I HAVE READ THEIR UNPUBLISHED DECISION).
Americans are the most self-important people in the world, stating that their citizenship is worth it for good women to prostitute themselves over.
[The same applies in the context of sexual exploitation of
domestic workers, migrant workers, sweatshop workers, or any instance where sex is
coerced or forced through threats of deportation,]
SO SUZANNE JACKSON WANTS TO BAN MARRIAGE TO FOREIGNERS ALTOGETHER WITH THIS REASONING ALONG WITH STOPPING ALL RELATIONSHIPS WHERE THE MAN EARNS MORE MONEY THAN THE WOMAN
[So that a person is led to believe that on account of the sex act, the person will receive respite from threats of
THE REASONING HERE ELUDES ME: IF A RELATIONSHIP IS NOT WORKING OUT, THE MAN OWES THE WOMAN A PLANE TICKET HOME AND SOME ALIMONY PAYMENTS DEPENDING ON THE LENGTH OF THE MARRIAGE. IF A WOMAN GIVES UP HER JOB IN KIEV TO FLY TO THE USA ON A FIANCE VISA, THE MAN HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ACTUALLY MARRY HER BUT HE DOES HAVE THE MORAL OBLIGATION TO GIVE HER ENOUGH MONEY TO FIND A NEW JOB IN HER HOME COUNTRY.
THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM MUST NOT RECOGNIZE THE RADICAL FEMINIST CRAP THAT RUSSIA OR THE PHILIPPINES ARE SUPPOSEDLY HORRIBLE PLACES TO LIVE IN WHERE THE PROSPECT OF RETURNING IS THE PROSPECT OF CRUEL AND INHUMAN PUNISHMENT
IN FACT, IS THERE A WAY FOR AN AMERICAN CITIZEN TO ASK THE SUPREME COURT TO ISSUE GUIDELINES ALONG THE LINE OF THIS DISCUSSION SO THAT ANY IDIOT JUDGE WILL BE AWARE THAT IT IS NOT A GIVEN THAT SOCALLED DEPORTATION IS A THREAT SO MUCH AS A VALID RESULT OF A RELATIONSHIP NOT WORKING OUT?
IT IS NOT ANYONE'S RESPONSIBILITY BUT THE FOREIGN WOMAN'S IF SHE WANTS TO PUNISH HERSELF BY BEING UNHAPPY IN THE USA AS COMPARED TO HAPPY IN THE WONDERFUL COUNTRY SHE PROBABLY COMES FROM
[The criminal penalties for sex trafficking should be brought to bear
against individuals who use IMOs to extort sex and domestic services from individual
brought into the U.S. through fiancee visas or through marriage.]
BUT HOW DO YOU PROVE THIS? WAIT A SECOND, SHE IS SAYING THAT, ACCORDING TO RADICAL FEMINIST IDEOLOGY, ALL MARRIAGES TO FOREIGNERS INVOLVES THIS SO WE ALL NEED TO HAVE CRIMINAL PENALTIES BROUGHT TO BEAR AGAINST US.
[IMOs also camouflage trafficking indirectly by inflating the number of visa
applicants, which reduces governmental resources to evaluate individuals' requests
for fiancee visas.]
IMOs INFLATE THE NUMBERS FOR THE SAME REASON THAT MATCH DOT COM PRETENDS THEY JUST GOT ONE MILLION NEW MEMBERS IN THE PAST TWENTY FOUR HOURS. It is marketing crap that are already regulated by fair trade laws and Match.com is in a lawsuit now because of the way they lie about their membership. BUT I WOULD PREFER THAT MATCH DOT COM WIN ITS CASE AND THE SUPREME COURT IS GOING TO HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN DATING WEBSITES
[Until recenty, U.S. immigration authorities conducted no
investigation of applicants for fiancee or spousal visas, not requiring any
background criminal check, ]
TECHNICALLY, WHILE THE TRO RESTRAINING ORDER WAS IN EFFECT ON IMBRA, THE US GOVERNMENT HAD NO RIGHT TO DELAY 10,000 MARRIAGES IN 2006 AND I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT NOBODY IS SUING FOR DAMAGES AS A RESULT.
WHEN IMBRA IS OVERTURNED THIS MONTH, IT NEEDS TO STAY OVERTURNED AS THE EC LAWYER BATTLES THE KIND OF RHETORIC FROM THIS DOCUMENT THAT MAKES IT SOUND NATURAL THAT A GOVERNMENT SHOULD INVESTIGATE ITS OWN CITIZENS INSTEAD OF THEIR FIANCES.
SUZANNE IS A GREAT RHETORICIAN: SHE MAKES IT SOUND UNCONSCIONABLE THAT IT HAS "ONLY BEEN RECENTLY" THAT THE US GOVERNMENT HAS TREATED MEN WHO DATE FOREIGN WOMEN DIFFERENTLY FROM MEN WHO DATE AMERICAN WOMEN
[not asking whether the petitioner is legally able to
marry, not even checking its own records to see if an applicant previously
petitioned for another person.]
IT IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS TO INTERVENE IN AN AMERICAN'S PRIVATE LIFE, AND IF I WERE TO TESTIFY BEFORE THE 11th CIRCUIT I WOULD ASK THAT THE FIANCE VISA BE ELIMINATED IN FAVOR OF A TOURIST VISA AT LEAST FOR RUSSIA AND THE UKRAINE AND KAZAHKSTAN. ASSUMING THAT THE FIANCE VISA IS FAIR (WHICH I DO NOT ASSUME) IT WOULD BE PRUDENT FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO SEE IF ANY OTHER WOMAN IS BEING APPLIED FOR SIMULTANEOUSLY. BUT IT IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS TO INVOLVE ITSELF IN THE AFFAIRS OF A SERIAL MONOGAMIST